Section 312IAC25-6-122. Underground mining; revegetation; statistical methodology  


Latest version.
  •    (a) The methods set forth in this section are used to evaluate the success of revegetation under section 120 of this rule using the sampling techniques under section 121 of this rule.

      (b) The minimum number of observations for the area under evaluation shall be determined as provided under this subsection as follows:

    (1) Except as provided in subdivisions (2) through (3), the following table is used to determine the required minimum number of observations:

    Size of Area Under

    Evaluation (In Acres)

    Crop

    Minimum Number

    of Observations

     

    Corn

     

    0–39

     

    8

    40–279

     

    12

    280–639

     

    16

    640 or more

     

    2

     

    Soybeans

     

    0–39

     

    10

    40–279

     

    12

    280–639

     

    16

    640 or more

     

    26

    Wheat and Oats

    0–39

     

    6

    40–279

     

    8

    280–639

     

    10

    640 or more

     

    14

    Sorghum

    0–39

     

    10

    40–279

     

    16

    280–639

     

    28

    640 or more

     

    40

    Mixed Hay

    0–39

     

    5

    40–279

     

    10

    280–639

     

    20

    640 or more

     

    20 + 1 additional sample for each 35 acres in excess of 640 acres

    (2) If any two (2) observations vary by more than fifteen percent (15%), the director may increase the minimum number of observations required by the table in subdivision (1). If additional samples are required, the formula in subsection (e) shall be used to determine that the number of observations evaluated is sufficient.

    (3) A statistical analysis of the result obtained from the area under evaluation shall be performed using the method from subsection (c) or (d). If there are apparent discrepancies between the submitted yield derived from random sampling and yield estimates derived by the director, the operator may be required to harvest specific fields in their entirety.

      (c) Sampling results shall be analyzed and the following statistical parameters determined:

    (1) Sample mean (average):

    Where:

    ∑Xi

    =

    The sum of the individual observation values.

     

    N

    =

    The number of observations.

    (2) Mean deviation squared:

     

    (3) Degree of freedom:

    d = N - 1

    (4) Sample standard deviation:

     

    (5) t-value:

    Where: T = desired target yield.

    The calculated t-value is compared with the value associated with the appropriate degree of freedom (d) in the following table to determine if the standard has been met. The calculated t-value must be less than or equal to the t-value derived from the table to demonstrate that the actual yield has achieved the standard with a ninety percent (90%) or greater statistical confidence.

    Degree of Freedom

    t-value

    1

    3.078

    2

    1.886

    3

    1.638

    4

    1.533

    5

    1.476

    6

    1.440

    7

    1.415

    8

    1.397

    9

    1.383

    10

    1.372

    11

    1.363

    12

    1.356

    13

    1.350

    14

    1.345

    15

    1.341

    16

    1.337

    17

    1.333

    18

    1.330

    19

    1.328

    20

    1.325

    21

    1.323

    22

    1.321

    23

    1.319

    24

    1.318

    25

    1.316

    26

    1.315

    27

    1.314

    28

    1.313

    29

    1.311

    30

    1.310

    40

    1.303

    60

    1.296

    120

    1.289

    1.282

      (d) Other statistical methods may be approved by the director.

      (e) To determine if the number of samples is sufficient, the following formula will be used:

    Number of samples required:

    Where:

    s

     =

    Sample standard deviation.

     

     

    =

    Mean.

    The formula set forth in this subsection prescribes an interactive method in which the number of required samples is dependent upon the variation between the samples. Once a minimum number of samples is obtained, the appropriate information is substituted into this formula to determine if a sufficient number of samples were evaluated given the variation in the data. The collection of additional random samples, together with reapplication of the formula may, depending upon the overall consistency in observations, change the required number of samples as data collection progresses. In general, fewer samples are required if there is greater consistency among samples. (Natural Resources Commission; 312 IAC 25-6-122; filed Jun 21, 2001, 2:53 p.m.: 24 IR 3575, eff Dec 1, 2001; readopted filed May 29, 2007, 9:51 a.m.: 20070613-IR-312070146RFA; readopted filed Sep 19, 2013, 10:12 a.m.: 20131016-IR-312130125RFA)