Section 312IAC26-5-5. Rating applications for community forestry grants

   (a) Grant applications are evaluated by the division of forestry with reference to the factors set forth in subsection (b).

  (b) The following factors are considered in rating grant applications for community forestry:

(1) The priority given to the project type under section 3(c) of this rule.

(2) The need for the project in the area served, including economic benefits.

(3) The extent of public support for the project, as evidenced by public meetings, surveys, and correspondence.

(4) The compatibility of the project with other facilities. Items considered within this subdivision include the locations of existing and planned:

(A) roads;

(B) utility lines;

(C) pipelines;

(D) sidewalks; and

(E) buildings.

(5) Whether the applicant has received previous grants under this article or another law providing similar benefits. An applicant who has not previously received funding receives a higher priority than an applicant who has.

(6) Whether the project will benefit a large number of individuals as opposed to a small number of individuals.

(7) The history of an applicant in processing prior grants. Consideration is given to whether or not previous grants have been administered effectively, efficiently, and according to standards established by the entity providing the grant.

(8) The likely duration of benefits derived from the project.

  (9) Whether the project is well-planned.

(10) Whether the budget is well-planned and cost-effective.

(11) Whether the applicant is providing cash as part of the match.

(12) Whether the applicant has the experience and resources needed to efficiently complete the project.

(Natural Resources Commission; 312 IAC 26-5-5; filed Dec 3, 1997, 3:45 p.m.: 21 IR 1283; readopted filed Nov 17, 2004, 11:00 a.m.: 28 IR 1315; readopted filed May 26, 2010, 10:37 a.m.: 20100609-IR-312100161RFA; readopted filed Sep 27, 2016, 1:53 p.m.: 20161026-IR-312160147RFA)